Event Description
Non-Human Intelligence (NHI)
No NHI encounter documented for this event.
On the evening of February 9, 1913, thousands of witnesses from Saskatchewan, Canada, to Bermuda and Brazil observed one of the most extraordinary and anomalous aerial events in recorded history — a procession of 40 to 60 bright objects crossing the sky in perfect horizontal formation over a period of approximately five minutes, moving at a slow, steady pace with an apparently controlled trajectory. The event was observed simultaneously across a ground track of approximately 7,000 kilometers.
Professor Clarence Chant of the University of Toronto, who collected and analyzed witness reports from across the continent, described the objects as moving in 'twos and threes and fours with a peculiar majestic deliberateness.' Witnesses consistently described the objects as appearing to be in controlled formation rather than random simultaneous trajectories. The objects were bright, with some witnesses describing them as flaming, and several produced smoke trails. The duration of observation — five minutes of sustained visibility across the entire trajectory — was far longer than typical meteor events.
The key anomaly that distinguished the 1913 procession from conventional meteor showers was the trajectory. A conventional meteor follows a curved path determined by atmospheric entry angle and gravitational influence, decelerating and typically burning up within seconds. The 1913 objects followed a level, horizontal trajectory at essentially constant altitude across 7,000 kilometers — a path physically inconsistent with free-fall dynamics. Objects in free-fall from space do not travel horizontally at constant altitude across the curvature of the Earth at low velocity; they enter the atmosphere at steep angles and decelerate rapidly.
Chant proposed that the objects were fragments of a natural Earth satellite — a small body captured by Earth's gravity and traveling in a low orbit — that had begun to decay. This hypothesis received some acceptance as the only natural explanation consistent with the observed horizontal trajectory. However, no such natural satellite had ever been identified prior to the event, and the perfect formation flying described by witnesses remained unexplained even under the natural satellite hypothesis.
The 1913 procession is studied in both conventional astronomy and UAP research as a genuinely anomalous event that defied easy categorization — too structured and prolonged for conventional meteors, too widely observed for misidentification, and exhibiting formation characteristics that natural phenomena do not produce.