UAP ArchiveUAP Archive
  • Globe
  • Timeline
  • Encounters
  • Observables
  • Crashes

Report Encounter

Preview layout← Back to classic layout
Illustrative reconstruction of the disc-shaped object described by Reinhold Hering and Friedrich Miksa over the Aggsbach Valley, Vienna Woods, August 3, 1972

Hering-Miksa UFO Encounter — Vienna Woods, Austria, 1972

August 3, 1972

Aggsbach Valley, Vienna Woods, Austria

Cold War

Illustrative reconstruction of the disc-shaped object described by Reinhold Hering and Friedrich Miksa over the Aggsbach Valley, Vienna Woods, August 3, 1972

UFO Insight (educational illustration)

  • DateAugust 3, 1972
  • LocationAggsbach Valley, Vienna Woods, Austria
  • Witnesses4
  • ShapeDisc
  • Credibility★★☆☆☆
Same eraCold War
  1. 1971Lago Cote Aerial Survey Photo — Costa Rica, September 1971
  2. 197141 Commando UFO Sighting — Cyprus, 1971
  3. 1972Hering-Miksa UFO Encounter — Vienna Woods, Austria, 1972
  4. 1972Kera Mini-UFO Incident (高知県毛利町UFO事件)
  5. 1972Baakline UFO Sighting — Shuf Mountains, Lebanon, August 1972

Credibility Audit

2 factors
  1. Multiple Witnesses+2
  2. Expert Witness+2
Raw total4
Final tier★★☆☆☆Low
Thresholds
  • ★0–3
  • ★★4–7
  • ★★★8–11
  • ★★★★12–16
  • ★★★★★17+

DoD Observables

1 of 5
  • Instantaneous Acceleration
  • Hypersonic Velocity
  • Low Observability
  • Trans-Medium Travel
  • Anti-Gravity Lift

Event Description

Observed Shape
Disc

Craft morphology

On the evening of August 3, 1972, several individuals in the forested Aggsbach Valley region of the Vienna Woods in Lower Austria observed a low-altitude luminous disc crossing the sky. The event was unusual not only for the credibility of its witnesses but for the geometric data one witness collected: head forester Reinhold Hering was able to estimate the object's trajectory and duration precisely enough that investigators could calculate an apparent diameter of approximately 180 feet and a maximum speed of roughly 500 feet per second, placing it in the supersonic range. A second witness, Friedrich Miksa — a local councillor and former anti-aircraft commander — independently corroborated the disc shape, the extraordinary speed, and the complete absence of any exhaust trail or combustion signature.

Reinhold Hering was in his thirties and employed as a head forester — a government-certified professional working in the Austrian forestry administration who routinely made precise measurements and observations in his work. He had aviation experience and stated the object was unlike any aircraft he had encountered in that context. Friedrich Miksa was a local councillor and held a position in the Military Science Department; crucially, he was a former anti-aircraft commander — a background that included training in identifying airborne targets by their silhouette, speed, and flight characteristics. His wife Anna Miksa was also present. Hering's companion Erika Graef witnessed the object alongside Hering. The combination of a forestry professional who could make angular measurements and a former anti-aircraft commander who could assess aircraft flight profiles makes this one of the most credentialed witness groups in any Austrian UAP report.

Hering and Graef, observing from the valley floor, described the object as disc-shaped with a dark upper surface bearing two red-orange lights and an extremely brilliant lower surface emitting light comparable to "a halogen fog-headlight." The craft passed approximately 600 feet above ground and traversed roughly one mile of visible sky during the encounter. Hering estimated the duration at 10 to 15 seconds. From these measurements, investigators calculated a flight speed of approximately 480 feet per second — well into the transonic and low-supersonic range. Based on the angular subtended size and estimated altitude, the object's diameter was computed at approximately 180 feet (55 meters). Miksa, observing independently from a different vantage point, described the object as "roundish and clearly outlined," appearing "bright yellowish orange" and shaped like "a squashed egg or thick disc." He assessed its speed as far exceeding any supersonic jet he was familiar with from his anti-aircraft service, and noted the complete absence of any exhaust trail or combustion signature.

Both primary witnesses with aeronautical backgrounds independently assessed the object's speed as consistent with Mach 5 to 6 — far beyond the operational envelope of any aircraft in Austrian or NATO inventory in 1972, and achievable only by purpose-built experimental hypersonic vehicles. The complete absence of sonic boom, exhaust trail, or combustion signature at speeds Miksa estimated as exceeding any supersonic jet is anomalous: aircraft operating at supersonic speeds produce both a bow shock audible as sonic boom and an exhaust plume. The object left no auditory signature of any kind. The 180-foot estimated diameter also exceeds the wingspan of any operational aircraft of the period.

None reported. The encounter was visual only. No radar tracking data was obtained, no EM effects on vehicles or equipment were reported, and no physical ground traces were documented. Hering telephoned the rural police station at Aggbach at 21:30 to report the sighting. The Central Meteorological Station of Vienna subsequently stated the object was unlikely to have been ball lightning or a meteorological balloon, and suggested a meteor as the most probable explanation.

Hering filed a report with the local police station at Aggsbach immediately following the encounter. The Central Meteorological Station of Vienna was consulted and stated the object was "not likely to have been ball lightning" or one of their balloons, but attributed the sighting to a meteor. Hering, with his aviation experience, rejected the meteor explanation: the object's level-altitude trajectory, maintained for the full 15-second observation, is incompatible with a meteor, which follows a ballistic arc and does not maintain constant altitude. No Austrian military investigation was initiated. Local media initially ridiculed Hering, referring to him in print as "the forester on a UFO hunt," but the involvement of Miksa — a local elected official and military professional — gave the case more durable credibility than a lone civilian report would have carried.

The official meteorological attribution of the sighting to a meteor constitutes a false explanation inconsistent with the observed horizontal flight path. No formal suppression, NDA, or witness intimidation was documented. The media ridicule directed at Hering was informal rather than organized. Austria had no formal UAP investigation program in 1972, and the case was not incorporated into any governmental archive.

The Hering-Miksa encounter is Austria's most credible documented UAP sighting. Its strength lies in the exceptional credentials of its two primary witnesses — a government forester with aviation experience and a former anti-aircraft commander with military-science training — and the measurable geometric data that produced speed and size estimates far exceeding any known 1972 aircraft. The case is unusual in that the witnesses with the most relevant technical backgrounds were the most emphatic in rejecting conventional explanations, rather than the reverse. It represents the best-documented Cold War UAP report from Austrian territory and was investigated by the UFO research community but never received official recognition or formal investigation by Austrian authorities.

Sources

  1. [1]mediaUFO Insight — 'A Bizarre Craft Over The Vienna Woods: The Hering-Miksa UFO Encounter'
  2. [2]mediaUFO Evidence — 'Two hunters witness brilliant disc passing over Vienna woods, August 3, 1972'